Are Colleges Outsourcing School E-mails To Big Players


Maintaining internal E-mail systems has long been the bane of the university information-technology director. Servers are unwieldy and unreliable, and in the past several years, the number of student complaints (“It’s all junk,” says one) has grown exponentially as forward-moving providers like YahooMail, Hotmail, and Gmail have increased expectations of what E-mail should offer.

The solution for a number of colleges has been to wave the white flag and outsource E-mail hosting to the experts.

Microsoft, which owns Hotmail, and Google (Gmail) are the biggest players in the educational E-mail hosting market. Along with the neat-o peripheral gizmos like messaging, calendars, and collaboration tools, the outsourced systems are more stable, have better spam filters, and provide much more storage space than the typical university’s in-house system. At the University of Pennsylvania, its old E-mail service gave students 60 megabytes of storage, just 3 percent of the 2 gigabytes Windows Live now provides.

E-mail service gave students 60 megabytes of storage, just 3 percent of the 2 gigabytes Windows Live now provides.

In return, Google and Microsoft get almost nothing, at least monetarily and in the short term. Microsoft’s Windows Live @ edu and the Google Apps Education Edition are free of charge for schools.

Eliminating another source of revenue, the two tech giants stripped their respective services of advertising in an effort to accommodate educators’ concerns. Microsoft breaks even on the venture (it does run ads on non-E-mail services like instant messaging), while Google, which makes almost all its money through advertising, runs at a loss.

But what money they don’t make at the moment will—the companies hope—pay great dividends in the form of lifelong users in the future, says Google’s Jeff Kelter. As quickly as they shuffle out of commencement, graduates see their E-mail transition to the traditional ad-based formats of Gmail and Hotmail. And unlike before, when universities couldn’t afford to host thousands of alumni, Google and Microsoft can maintain every account indefinitely, retaining customers as long as customers still want them.

Not all schools are ready to outsource their tech dirty work, with privacy and security topping the list of concerns. Critics worry that by handing over the responsibility of E-mail hosting, colleges also relinquish the freedom to keep the information safe in the best way they see fit. Even in the corporate world, there is great skepticism of consumer technologies like Google Apps.

Yet most university IT managers agree that outsiders would do a better job protecting individual E-mail from viruses and spam

Yet most university IT managers agree that outsiders would do a better job protecting individual E-mail from viruses and spam than their own small operations, and strong word-of-mouth praise has done wonders to supplement the almost nonexistent marketing budgets for these Microsoft and Google projects.

“Some people didn’t like the idea of outsourcing to a major corporation,” says Alex Dybsky, a senior at Northwestern University, which has partnered with Google, “but looking at how much better of a product it is, people just succumb. It’s that good.”

The price tag—or lack of one—isn’t a bad sales pitch either. If Penn and Northwestern are any example, schools can save around $1 million over the course of several years by abandoning their E-mail systems.

Ramin Sedehi, the vice dean for finance and administration at Penn, says 30 percent of Penn’s students already forward their messages to outside clients, and he predicts universities will eventually be out of the E-mail hosting business altogether.

“If you’re not going to embrace it,” he says, “you’ll get left behind.”

Ball State University and the Indiana University Alumni Association are now on Windows Live, and Arizona State University switched to Google Apps in October 2006, already converting at least 40,000 of its 65,000 students to the new system. Penn State University and California Polytechnic State University, to name two, have been in talks, while other schools are watching and waiting.

If you do go to campuses where “unreliable,” “awful,” and just plain “terrible” are words often used in close proximity to “university webmail,” those like Dybsky will tell you that waiting may not be the best strategy for schools or students. “If you’re not going to embrace it,” he says, “you’ll get left behind.”

by Alison Go via

7 Comments on “Are Colleges Outsourcing School E-mails To Big Players

  1. Pingback: Outsourcing College Functions - The Kyle David Group

  2. Education tells us how to make laws. Education tells us the meaning of laws. Laws means bring a boundaries witch we must be in these bondries. Education tells us the law order to be limit those activities witch are harmful for people.

  3. Well one should let an expert handle what they are better in rather than being a quack and do it themselves as this will increase risk and provides low quality and storage. Thanks a lot for sharing this informative post, as a student myself I appreciate it.

  4. Enrolling and hiring the right representatives can be a challenge. Discover how to make a successful online job commercial and land your position presented online on get the most introduction for your job opening.

  5. Education deals the natural sciences. It deals the physique of the world. It studies the ozone the world. We can collect information about chemistry it deals a atom and advance technology. We can make a aromatic atom witch protect our state.

  6. Finding a regular job can be a hard procedure and you have to go give interviews at different places which will cost you the fare charges even though you do not get the job whereas finding a job online is easy and comfortable. You can give interview right from your home.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>